Re: [cobalt-security] I've been reading . . .

[Theodore Jones <theoj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Matthias,

I would have to agree.  It's really designed for an out of the box, don't
have to think about it for too much solution... if you're really concerned
about security, customized logs, etc... the documentation is pretty slim on
the "under the hood" configurations they've allready set into place when
they ship a unit.

My extra .02,

~ Theo

Matthias Pigulla wrote:

> I'm not so well-informed about that... but I think the server will split
> the big log file into site-specific files on his own?
>
> The advantage of having only one log file at run time is that it saves
> file descriptors.
>
> However, I don't like the RaQ that much. You can do fine things with it,
> allright, but to integrate it seamlessly (english ;-)?) into your site
> concept, you have to be able to tweak it "under the hood".
>
> I think the documentation Cobalt ships is - esp. the aspects of
> configuring the mail service - not so brilliant.
>
> Just my $0.02,
> Matthias
> --
>
>  w e b f a c t o r y   G m b H
>    Matthias Pigulla <mp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> - Geschaeftsfuehrer
>    Lessingstr. 60 - D-53113 Bonn - Germany - www.webfactory.de
>    Fon +49(0)228-9114455 - Fax +49(0)228-9114499 - ICQ 6394233
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > BUT, please give me some detailed instructions on splitting the access
> > log into separate logs for the sites. "Jeff" in an e-mail
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-security mailing list
> cobalt-security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security