Re: [cobalt-security] Vacation Mail Exploit patch for RaQ4

[Martin Moeller <martin@xxxxxxx>]

Ah, well, it applied nicely anyway ;)
What is the issue since it doesn't concert vanilla RaQ4?
It seems like an odd place to have differences between RAID and non-RAID
versions. Is there more to the RaQ4r, that I just haven't noticed?

Regards,

/Martin Moeller.

On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Jeff Lovell wrote:

> Martin Moeller wrote:
> > 
> > I have looked in the package and found that they only check for 3100R and
> > most RaQ4's that I know about report themselves as 3001R, hence the
> > problem. I have made a version that checks only for 3001R (but could be
> > made to look at both). It's one line that needs alteration.
> > I can post it on cobalt-aid.sourceforge.net, if more people are
> > interested? Of course if Cobalt simply updates the script to check for
> > both strings, that's even better ;)
> 
> The update only applies to the RaQ4r, not the vanilla RaQ4.
> 
> Jeff
> 
> -- 
> Jeff Lovell
> Cobalt Networks, Inc.
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-security mailing list
> cobalt-security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security
>