Re: [cobalt-security] Questions about official cobalt kernel [off topic rant]

[Paul Jacobs <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 10:03 AM 7/2/2002, you wrote:
> Paul Jacobs did once again write something like:
> > Would rather spend the money on a Apple OS 10 Server and put plesk on
> > it. Or sun will have to drop there prices to compete with apple :)
>
> Thanks for that bit of marketing insight.
> Was it related to cobalt security?
> Was it even related to security?
> So was I remotely interested in hearing it?
> What say you?

No apology's.



> We're all highly aware of how unimpressed you are with Sun/Cobalt, please
> *please* find somewhere else to vent your frustration. Making the odd post
> to a support list like this is not helping, it's just filling up everyone's
> mailboxes with dross along the lines of:
>
> "Sun have abandoned all old Raq owners to an old kernel family!"
> "Actually you can upgrade but it's unsupported because its so risky its
> unsupportable. You need to really know what you're doing for the benefits to
> outweigh the risks."
> "Sun have abandoned all old Raq owners to an old kernel family!"
> [repeat]

All ture.


> The only reason I don't plonk your emails is because, as you clearly know
> your systems, sometimes you almost say something useful. Please try to up
> your ratio of useful postings to "oh isn't it all terrible, someone should
> do something" postings[1].
>
> Rant ends,
> Stephen
>
> [1] Of course, my ratio's dropping like a stone... :o)
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-security mailing list
> cobalt-security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security