[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [cobalt-security] fatal flex scanner?
- Subject: RE: [cobalt-security] fatal flex scanner?
- From: "Jelmer Jellema" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 14:10:34 +0200
- Organization: Spin in het Web www.spininhetweb.nl
- List-id: Mailing list for users to address network security on Cobalt products. <cobalt-security.list.cobalt.com>
Thanks!
I'm just not so good at exposing of old habits, so that's why I still use
nslookup. Dig gives to much output. Is host broken too?
Thanks again,
Jelmer
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Jelmer Jellema - Spin in het Web
http://www.spininhetweb.nl
Spin in het Web: Alle Touwtjes In Handen
-----------------------------------------------------------------
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: cobalt-security-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cobalt-security-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Namens Gerald Waugh
> Verzonden: maandag 29 september 2003 13:30
> Aan: Cobalt Security List
> Onderwerp: Re: [cobalt-security] fatal flex scanner?
>
>
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Jelmer Jellema wrote:
> > I got this error when ctrl-c'ing nslookup on my raq4:
> >
> > fatal flex scanner internal error--end of buffer missed
> >
> > Some googling told me this could have something to do with
> the Zend engine,
> > but still I'm not sure what Zend has to do with nslookup.
> Is this okay
> > behavior?
>
> AFAIK flex is a lexicon used by nslookup, nothing to worry about.
> BTW, use dig, nslookup is obsolete and broken!
>
> Gerald
> --
> http://frontstreetnetworks.com | http://store.raqware.com
> Front Street Networks LLC, 229 Front Street, Ste.#C
> New Haven, CT 06513-3203 | phone: +1-203-785-0699
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-security mailing list
> cobalt-security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security
>