[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-security] FW: [ISN] [BUGTRAQ] Bug in Bind 9.1.0? (fwd)
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-security] FW: [ISN] [BUGTRAQ] Bug in Bind 9.1.0? (fwd)
- From: "Mike Fritsch" <mfritsch@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:12:19 -0800
- List-id: Mailing list for users to address network security on Cobalt products. <cobalt-security.list.cobalt.com>
> Might interest those of you actually installing the DNS upgrade
> on your Cobalt product. Does the Cobalt upgrade use 8.2.3 or 9.1.0?
8.2.3
Mike
>
> Brandon Wheaton
> UNIX Systems Engineer
> ValiCert, Inc.
> 1215 Terra Bella Ave.
> Mountain View, CA 94043
> 650.280.UNIX
>
> ----
> Sure UNIX is user friendly; it's just picky about who its friends are.
>
>
>
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Jay D. Dyson <jdyson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 18:05:21 -0800
> > Subject: Re: [ISN] [BUGTRAQ] Bug in Bind 9.1.0? (fwd)
> > To: ISN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >
> > Latest named just craps out when nmap scanned.
> > And Vixie wants to charge money for this.
> > I'll just use DJBDNS, thankyouverymuch.
> >
> > FYI, there are other nmap scans that *will* knock over x86
> > systems running
> > BIND.
> >
> >
> > - ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 15:24:45 -0700
> > From: Ben Greenbaum <bgreenbaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: BUGTRAQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [BUGTRAQ] Bug in Bind 9.1.0?
> >
> > Forwarded from a reader who wishes to remain anonymous:
> >
> > - --------------------------------------
> > I just tried nmap O -sT -p 53 on a Cobalt RAQ running Linux
> > 2.0.34 for MIPS, stock out of the box RAQ rented from a colo
> > vendor, with 9.1.0 compiled on that machine, and nameservice
> > stopped responding. I've only tested this on one RAQ, so it
> > may be something about its config and not a general issue.
> >
> > No flags - it was just ./configure, make, make install. nmap
> > consistently halts named there.
> >
> > The same command run against 9.1.0 on BSDi 4.0.1 and Linux
> > 2.2.16 (both x86)
> > had no effect.
> > - --------------------------------------
> >
> > Ben Greenbaum
> > Director of Site Content
> > SecurityFocus
> > http://www.securityfocus.com
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: 2.6.2
> > Comment: E-mail me for my PGP Public Key.
> >
> > iQCVAwUBOoCtZNCClfiU/BIVAQE7awP/UJEh3JuT+nZe6Eh3CxJUMZcOXOR7k4Tw
> > eCxmFzIFCUym8zvHET8arSK9lYDd8r6LnsgjcZdi3bBJ+zQLfc7AgufS02bX2bb+
> > EtiQ5ENF4PLQnyTljwp3k9SBztiILCpUSJJu9FKrGWlQcynruGhR4CGTbaZ6tlbn
> > Du/NyETsdwE=
> > =hRJG
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-security mailing list
> cobalt-security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security