[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-security] Portsentry, ipchains and pmfirewall
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-security] Portsentry, ipchains and pmfirewall
- From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 23:20:23 +0000 (GMT)
- List-id: Mailing list for users to address network security on Cobalt products. <cobalt-security.list.cobalt.com>
> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 23:54:20 +0100
> From: Michael Stauber <cobalt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Ooooh yeah <double-sigh>. Webmin is a nice example (and ripe
> target) for the dangers of falling prey to an UDP attack. As
> much as I love(d) Webmin, it's a dire security risk these days.
Can't say that I care for it. I grew up on the command line, and
have never found a GUI that I truly like. Gimme a shell any day.
> > (Hey, don't ignore Slackware!)
>
> That's one I haven't tested yet, so I can't relate.
It's rather BSD-ish. The setup routine is similar to FreeBSD's
/stand/sysinstall. Init scripts are BSD-style, _not_ SysV-style
crud. And the package manager also seems to borrow heavily from
FreeBSD, if one wishes to use packages.
> I see it the same way, but it's hard to educate people towards
> that ideal unless they get hit hard enough by bad luck and
> property damage. It starts much lower than that actually. Just
Too true. A couple weeks ago, I received a call from someone who
had a colo customer get cracked. Alas, they used telnet instead
of SSH, and weren't running VLANs. Oops.
> today I worked for an "ISP" who had not even bothered to backup
> his primary webserver. Well, who's to blame? I don't want to
> point fingers, but selling these things as "Server Appliance"
> (therefore suggesting: Plug and Play, Ready to Run, No Extras
> Needed) doesn't really prepare most of the start-ups to deal
> with a environment as hostile as the internet. This even hurts
> SUN/Cobalt itself, as they apparently can't even sell their own
> Firewall (the Velociraptor) with success.
Heh. I probably shouldn't voice my opinions on a Cobalt list,
but I know what you mean. It's like saying, "Here's a car with
an automatic transmission; you're now qualified to drive Grand
Prix!"
> Speaking of it ... see URL below for an interesting (half way related)
> article: http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/23770.html
I'll have to check it out. I'm a bit behind on both UF and The
Reg... most everything except the NANOG list. ;-)
Eddy
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist@xxxxxxxxx>
To: blacklist@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT
send mail to <blacklist@xxxxxxxxx>, or you are likely to be blocked.