RE: [cobalt-security] RaQ 550 and bandwidth monitoring?

["Jamie - i-Dot" <jamie@xxxxxxxxx>]

2x 100mbit Links from 2 Tier1 Suppliers,  datacentre located, full
100mbit capacity per link, gig-e upstream to one tier1

More Dedicated Servers than webhosting..  

But were getting OT here..


-----Original Message-----
From: cobalt-security-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cobalt-security-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David
Smulsky
Sent: 15 August 2002 23:34
To: cobalt-security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cobalt-security] RaQ 550 and bandwidth monitoring?


how many of you on this list actually run or work for a webhosting
company?

what sorta dedicated connections do you have, are you hosting inhouse,
or co-locating?

dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Jacobs" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: [cobalt-security] RaQ 550 and bandwidth monitoring?


> At 02:22 PM 8/15/2002, you wrote:
> >Why is a T1 3 x slower the a cable modem but 20 x more expensive...
> >
> >Makes me think twice about this 1000$/month  investment if its slower
then
> >the cable modem we already have..
> >
> >Dave
>
> Cable modems are shared bandwidth with no guarantee of what you will 
> get
up
> or down, T-1's are on most Level 1 POP'S not shared in the same way 
> that cable modems are... you get guarantee's on T-1's (SLA'S) and you 
> don't on
a
> cable modem.....
> T-1's are the only smart way to run a business..... yes, you can run a

> small company on a cable modem, but you are never sure what type of 
> bandwidth you will get at any time.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-security mailing list
> cobalt-security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security
>

_______________________________________________
cobalt-security mailing list
cobalt-security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security