[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-security] [RaQ3] Security update (simple) question
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-security] [RaQ3] Security update (simple) question
- From: "David Seaton" <david@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 13:28:52 -0500
- List-id: Mailing list for users to address network security on Cobalt products. <cobalt-security.list.cobalt.com>
Thanks! That's was what I was hoping for.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Timberlake" <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: [cobalt-security] [RaQ3] Security update (simple) question
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> I was updating one of my RaQ3's I have in the lab and I got one of
> the updates out of order.
>
> Proftpd Security Update 5.0.1 - RaQ3-All-Security-5.0.1-15823.pkg
> Util-linux update 5.0.1 - RaQ3-All-Security-5.0.1-15673.pkg
>
> I don't think these two will cause a problem being in the wrong
> order, I just wanted to ask the experts to make sure.
No, it will not cause any problems. These 2 PKGs are unrelated to
each other, and each has no pre-requisites. That's usually the main
reason for needing a certain install order...
And if there is a prerequisite that's not satisfied, the install
process should let you know that.
- --
Bruce Timberlake
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+XoXHvLA2hUZ9kgwRAkhcAJ4ruXYPrQz63hLtWTNC3Gpkpx5L9ACbBLIr
D5pRyk6rdcf+svuPLem+9FU=
=V4xv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
cobalt-security mailing list
cobalt-security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security