Re: [cobalt-security] ProFTPD issues

[Mike Vanecek <nospam99@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 7 Feb 2001 14:04:39 -0800, Jeff Lovell <jlovell@xxxxxxx> wrote:

:>On Wed, 07 Feb 2001, Mr. M wrote:
:>
:>> Proftpd 1.2.0rc3 was released yesterday.
:>> 
:>> Below is today's post on Bugtraq about it.  I'm wondering if we are going to
:>> see an RPM from Cobalt on this any time soon?
:>
:>RPMs are available:
:>
:>i386: (Qube3, RaQ3, RaQ4, XTR, CacheRaQ4)
:>ftp://ftp.cobaltnet.com/pub/experimental/RPMS/i386/proftpd-1.2.0rc3-C1.i386.rpm
:>
:>mips w/ PAM: (RaQ2)
:>ftp://ftp.cobaltnet.com/pub/experimental/RPMS/mips/proftpd-1.2.0rc3-C1.mips.rpm
:>
:>mips w/o PAM: (RaQ1, Qube2)
:>ftp://ftp.cobaltnet.com/pub/experimental/RPMS/mips/proftpd-1.2.0rc3-C1-NOPAM.mips.rpm
:>
:>As usual, these RPMs are considered experimental and unsupported
:>until an official pkg file from Cobalt is posted to the website.


Why is the Qube2 specified as NOPAM? When I check my system for PAM, I find:

[admin@vanecek admin]$ locate pam
/etc/pam.conf
/etc/pam.d
/etc/pam.d/ftp
/etc/pam.d/imap
/etc/pam.d/other
/etc/pam.d/ppp
/etc/pam.d/rexec
/etc/pam.d/rlogin
/etc/pam.d/rsh
/etc/pam.d/sshd
/etc/pam.d/su
/etc/security/pam_env.conf

Thanks, Mike.